|
|
FREE SHIPPING on Orders over $25!
AudibleInk - March: A Novel
|
|
List Price: $24.95
Our Price: $16.61
Your Save: $ 8.34 ( 33% )
Availability: N/A
Manufacturer: Viking Adult
|
Currently OUT OF STOCK
Average Customer Rating:  
|
|
Binding: Hardcover
Dewey Decimal Number: 823.914
Format: Bargain Price
Label: Viking Adult
Manufacturer: Viking Adult
Number Of Items: 1
Number Of Pages: 288
Publication Date: 2005-03-03
Publisher: Viking Adult
Studio: Viking Adult
|
|
|
|
|
|
Editorial Reviews:
|
From the author of the acclaimed YEAR OF WONDERS, a historical novel and love story set during a time of catastrophe, on the front lines of the American Civil War. Set during the American Civil War, MARCH tells the story of John March, known to us as the father away from his family of girls in LITTLE WOMEN, Louisa May Alcott's classic American novel. In Brooks' telling, March emerges as an abolitionist and idealistic chaplain on the front lines of a war that tests his faith in himself and in the Union cause when he learns that his side, too, is capable of barbarism and racism. As he recovers from a near-fatal illness in a Washington hospital, he must reassemble the shards of his tattered mind and body, and find a way to reconnect with a wife and daughters who have no idea of the ordeals he has been through. As Alcott drew on her real life sisters in shaping the characters of her little women, Brooks turned to the journals and letters of Bronson Alcott, Louisa May's father, an idealistic educator, animal rights exponent and abolitionist who was a friend and confidant of Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau. The story spans the vibrant intellectual world of Concord and the sensuous antebellum South, through to the first year of the Civil War as the north reels under a series of unexpected defeats. Like her bestselling YEAR OF WONDERS, MARCH is a love story set in a time of catastrophe. It explores the passions between a man and a woman, the tenderness of parent and child, and the life-changing power of an ardently held belief.
|
|
|
Spotlight customer reviews:
|
Customer Rating:
Summary: Not At All Like Little Women
Comment: I very much enjoyed "March". It tells the story of a man who probably has more moral conviction than actual courage. This is very reflective of many people.
WARNING: If you are looking for a sequel to Little Women, look elsewhere. This is grittier, raunchier and is linked only by a few characters and nothing else.
It does a good job at capturing some of the basics of the Civil War especially the illustration that most Union soldiers didn't give a damn about ending slavery and also that most Afican Americans were treated worse after emancipation than before. Plantation owners had taken much better care of them when they were property than when they became low priced, replaceable labor.
In all I found the pace to be brisk and the emotional conflicts inside Mr. March to be compelling. He was annoying in some of his silly choices as many of us are.
In many ways, I think it's unfortunate that Brooks chose to link this story to Little Women. Many reviewers who loved "Little Women" are very distraught by the portrayal of some of their favourite characters. I think the link is a bit gimmicky and subtracts more than it adds.
It's a strong piece of writing that stands well on its own.
Customer Rating:
Summary: Richly Layered
Comment: Here's my advice about reading "March." Skip to the Afterward and read it first. It's just a suggestion, particularly for those not familiar with "Little Women" and its place within the Civil War. I think you'll admire the research and sheer work that went into developing the concept of "March" and, as a result, more appreciative of the arc of the story and the punch it packs. Geraldine Brooks' idea for this book, frankly, is genius and it allows for the combination of solid research about the war and her vivid imagination. How many books of non-fiction and fiction can there be about the Civil War? "March" would suggest that there are few limits, particularly if the vein being mined is this rich. Mr. March's journey through the battlegrounds is the journey of an idealist running smack into reality--and paying the price. At his core, Mr. March firmly believes in the power of knowledge and learning, yet encounters slaves with "hands innocent of pen or quill." He is used to judging people by "how lettered" they are. (I was reading this book as Barack Obama was beginning his transition plans, shortly after the November election in 2008; it made for a fascinating backdrop to consider what was happening 140 years earlier.)
Mr. March encounters all the horrors of the war and yet protects his wife from the bloody details in his letters home--and from his own secrets as well. The result is a richly layered book through the first two-thirds that grows even more depth as Marmee arrives in Washington, D.C. to face the brutality first hand and the "dreadful alchemy" and "empty glory" of war and disease. Her anger is palpable--and covers thousands of years of remorse. "The waste of it. I sit here, and I look at him, and it is as if a hundred women sit beside me: the revolutionary farm wife, the English peasant woman, the Spartan mother--`Come back with your shield or on it,' she cried, because that was what she was expected to cry. And then she leaned across the broken body of her son and the words turned to dust in her throat."
"March" is a brilliant book--I am amazed at how much ground Brooks covers in a fairly short novel and, reading it today, realize its insights apply, vivid and stark as they are.
Customer Rating:
Summary: Beautifully written book.....not so great ending.
Comment: I won't go into details about the plot; amazon has already done a pretty decent job at that. What I do want to do is address some of the other reviewers' comments and also talk a little bit about why I gave this book 4 stars and not 5.
First: This book is NOT a sequel to "Little Women." Anyone who complains that "as a sequel to 'Little Women' this book sucks" is, I'm afraid, an idiot who neither owns, nor has access to, a dictionary. "March" is what you would call a revisionist text -- it takes characters and storylines from one story (in this case, Louisa May Alcott's "Little Women"), and uses them to create an entirely new universe of the author's making.
Like most people who have read it, I love "Little Women." Unfortunately, it is somewhat hampered by 19th century conventions regarding what is and is not proper to write about. Written more than a century and a half later, "March" does not suffer from any of those pitfalls. We get sex, violence, and an abundance of passion -- none of which is gratuitous. Most importantly, we get to see the virtuous figures of Marmee and Mr. March, sketched in "Little Women," in a completely new (and far more complex, interesting, and realistic) light.
To get a few other things out of the way: stylistically, Ms. Brooks' writing here is nearly flawless. She has the voice of a poet, without being pretentious, schlocky, or needlessly verbose. On several occasions, her words brought me to tears. Don't trust the words of any reviewer who gripes that the book "is too long" or "drags way too much in the beginning" -- I'm fairly certain the person is either a callow teen or else a supremely ignorant adult who can only stomach things written by authors like Dan Brown.
Here is my beef with this book: SPOILER ALERT!
(1) I wanted to hear more from Marmee. I can't tell you how welcome and refreshing her point of view / narrative was after keeping company with the high-minded, highly naive, and somewhat exasperating, Mr. March, for so many chapters. Her realization that she has been betrayed and lied to for so many years, by her lover, her partner, and her confidante, was for me, the climax of the novel. How would she confront him, I wondered? Would she berate him, shame him, remind him of all that she sacrificed for the sake of his misguided idealism? Marmee never gets her day, unfortunately. A true martyr (more than Mr. March could ever claim to be), she bites her tongue for the sake of her daughters. She remains ever supportive of her husband during his recovery, and provides him with the love and physical comforts he needs to heal and come back home to his family.
(2) I realize that Bronson Alcott (and therefore, Mr. March), was an idealist, a philospher, an intellectual -- in short, a man of the mind, and not of the world. For the most part, I was able to go with the flow and accept him for what he was without judgment or censure. But towards the end of the novel, I started getting angry. While his loyal wife and expectant daughters waited for him to come home, he slowly recovered in a hospital in Washington only to....decide that he would follow Grace, his one-time love, in her duties as a war nurse?? And here's the kicker -- because he feels he is not WORTHY enough to come home to his family?! Selfish is what he is. Basically, we the readers are told that the only reason March goes back to Concord is because Grace tells him to. What a coward. What would his precious daughters think of him if they knew about his deceit, his disloyalty, his inconstancy? In the last pages of the novel he looks at each of his daughters and sees only the slaughtered slaves he left behind in the battlefields. What a father.
Don't get me wrong. This is an incredible book, and very deserving of all the accolades it has garnered. Much like its main character, however, it is imperfect. Read the novel, by all means, and revel in every beautifully crafted and heart-wrenching sentence. But do not expect to come away from the experience with anything less than the feeling that the novel, much like its protagonist, could have come to a better, and far more settling, conclusion.
Customer Rating:
Summary: I Loved Meeting Mr. March And Hearing His Story
Comment: This is one of the most Pulizer-worthy novels I've read in a long while. The novel tells the previously untold story of the absent father in Louisa May Alcott's Little Women (Signet Classics). In Little Women, the reader only gets to know Peter March through his letters sent home to his family from the Civil War. Of course, in the interest of sparing his family the details of war, his letters are more cheerful than his reality. Geraldine Brooks uses the novel March to tell of Mr. March's early life as a traveling salesman, of his first kiss with someone other than his future wife, of the meeting of his wife, of his connections to Emerson and Thoreau, of his strong abolitionist sentiments, of the war that changed him both physically and mentally, and of misunderstandings and wrongs that were never made right in his life. Brooks draws heavily from the journals of Alcott's own father, Bronson Alcott, in order to flesh out the character of Mr. March. Since the "little women" in Alcott's novels were based on the members of her own family, it makes sense that Mr. March would be based on her father and that the March family would be acquainted with the same people they were. The Alcotts were, after all, contemporaries and acquaintances of many of the transcendentalist thinkers and writers of the time such as Emerson and Thoreau.
This is definitely the best prequel written by a different author that I've ever read. I remember being completely disappointed trying to read sequels or prequels by different authors for books such as Gone with the Wind. The author's journalistic background definitely helped her to give attention to the proper details needed to research such a book.
I initially did not recognize the name of the author as being the author of Nine Parts of Desire: The Hidden World of Islamic Women, a book that I loved so much that I ... er ... bought it from the library pretending that I'd lost it (in the days before amazon.com made any book accessible for purchase). Nine Parts of Desire is a work of non-fiction that she wrote as a journalist. So I'm thrilled to see that she has such a beautiful piece of fiction out there as well. Halfway through the book, I found myself saying to myself, "wow, this is a good book" and hoping to read something else by her soon.
Customer Rating:
Summary: LIttle Women Grows Up
Comment:
This book can be appreciated on two levels. First, it is an enthralling novel of the Civil War filled with well-researched details about the people and not the battles.
Second, and the reason I bought it, is that it is the adventures of Mr. March, the rather vague and saintly father from Little Women. Little Women was one of the very first books I had ever read and I fell in love with the March family. Reading MARCH was like discovering things about your parents' pasts that both shocked you and made you admire them. I had just finished "Eden's Outcasts", a biography of Louisa May Alcott and her father Bronson Alcott and this book was so close to Bronson Alcott that I had to keep reminding myself it was a novel.
Some readers might be disturbed by the nature of Mr. March's fall from grace. But his sins serve to illuminate his goodness. If you want to preserve your images of the March family from your childhood reading, don't read this. If you want to find out more about Alcott herself and what might lie behind the stage dressing of her novels, read it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
