Customer Rating:  
Summary: Overwrought and Over-reviewed
Comment: I was compelled by the genre that this book purported to fall into coupled with the fact that it won the Pulitzer Prize. I because of the later, I wasn't expecting "The Road Warrior" or anything, but what I was expecting was something of worth. That's most definitely not what I got.
The entire narrative left me with a handful of words consistently popping to mind, in no particular order: grey, okay, ash, cart, cold, starving. There are more, but they are equally as dreary.
Much of this "story" is a bleak road picture following a man and a boy south to get warmer after some cataclysm of global proportions wipes out most life. The main problem is that there are inconsistencies in the narrative, and with no plot (which is fine) and with what seems to be a choice not to punctuate properly (some but not all apostrophes and all quotation marks are missing), events such as finding an amazing cache of food in one scene, to be nearly starving again only pages later, then pages after that producing a can of peaches that he and the boy share in the cold. An awful lot of time is spent traveling south and quickly searching houses for supplies, but nearly four days are spent searching a boat, the man wracking his brain for helpful insight of where one might hide food or supplies on such a vessel.
My guess is that this book is intended to be entirely metaphorical. I surmised at one point that the man and the boy as well as some other characters that appear are all meant to be parts of the same psyche; letting cynicism and paranoia die in favor of innocence and hope, even if naive hope is the best that can be arrived at. Perhaps the child represents the future, potential, and the man represents the present, stagnation. There is an "old man" character that pops up seeming to reinforce this hypothesis, perhaps representing the past, acquiescence, and blind acceptance, but then one must wonder why the same number of pages are devoted to description of cannibal slave-driver soldiers that the man and boy hide from. Not only that, but such encounters seem to reinforce the man's reluctance to stop and trust other people to protect the boy. If the story is a metaphor, what is it meant to illustrate?
Moral ambiguity abounds, but it is pointed out as much more serious than one the circumstances dictate. The man kills another, clearly malevolent person, to protect the boy. No pontification, but time is spent with the man trying to rationalize this with the boy. Rationalization is made for taking food from abandoned houses, but not from abandoned supermarkets or from dried and abandoned apple orchards.
Personally, I believe that the boy is not the man's son, but that he has taken the boy as his responsibility following the suicidal death of the man's wife. She gives birth to a son and kills herself after the cataclysm, but tells him that he must face reality - that he could never take care of the baby himself in this horrible world they are faced with. The boy could be his son, but it doesn't need to be, at least not biologically. The drive of the man is to prove this woman, the love of his life that he has lost, wrong. To this end, poor planning on his part, and a deadly condition leaving him with limited time in which to do this, leads to stumbling along "the road" and into dangerous situations and near calamity.
I can only recommend this book to aspiring writers wanting to know what it takes to win the Pulitzer Prize. Clearly, punctuation, plot, character development and consistent narrative aren't necessary, but drawing vague metaphors regarding human nature and the declination of western society are encouraged.
Lame.
Customer Rating:
Summary: The Good and the Bad
Comment: Its a beautifully written novel and the two main characters are interesting and they do have some unusual encounters in what is essentially a world in ashes. I cant fault the author in his style and the main idea but I found the last 50 pages to be lacking. I couldnt help but feel let down by the ending. That was it? Not to spoil it for anyone else but the author made some odd choices in what he would describe at length, in great detail, and then almost rush past others, in particular the ending.
So I give it 5 stars for the writing, 3 for the story and execution, for a 4 star average. Its worth the read.
Customer Rating:
Summary: The Road y Cormac McCarthy
Comment: Honestly, I loved this book. It's bleakness, its strange new post apocalyptic world, its overall sense of hopelessness. But I can totally see a lot of people hating this book. The timing, structure, and dialogue are not formulaic so if you are looking for a summer beach book, this is not it. If you are looking for a good piece of literature with themes, emotions, and vision, you could do much worse than the Road.
Customer Rating:
Summary: Interesting, but not for the genre
Comment: The book itself is okay in that it does describe what a post-apocalyptic world maybe like and removes most of the romanticism associated with it. If you are wanting to read a book that takes an artistic approach to dialogue and character development then this book is for you.
However, if you are really into the the post-apocalyptic genre then this book may be a great disappointment, other then as mention gets rid of some of the romanticism of it and places the harsh reality of an end of the world scenario in front of you. Compared to classics like "Earth Abides" and "Atlas, Babylon" this book just does not compare.
Customer Rating:
Summary: Modern Masterpiece
Comment: Read it in one sitting. I need to read it again to pick up the subtle details in narrative. The conversation style that many have commented on is done to reflect the condition of these two people. Starving, physically weak and emotionally damaged by the horrors they witness on their journey. Recommended read.
|
